Court Adjourns Alleged Container Theft Case After Prosecution, Defence Clash Over Procedure
- Sarah Kallay
- 1d
- 2 min read

Proceedings in the alleged container theft case involving ten accused persons took a procedural turn on Thursday after the prosecution and defence disagreed over the service of legal notices before Pademba Road Court No.1.
The accused, including Abu Bakarr Kabba Mansaray and Ibrahim Ahmed Kargbo, are facing charges of conspiracy, theft, forgery, and obstructing justice in connection with the alleged theft of a shipping container at Queen Elizabeth II Quay.
The matter, presided over by Magistrate Mustapha Brima Jah, was adjourned to 13 August 2026 to allow the defence to prepare its witnesses and both parties to comply with procedural requirements.
During the proceedings, State Prosecutor Yusuf Isaac Sesay, Esq., argued that the defence had served only a notice of intention to cross-examine witnesses rather than a formal application as required under the Criminal Procedure Act 2024. He submitted that the court should ensure compliance with the relevant legal provisions before the matter proceeds.
In response, defence counsel maintained that the notice had been properly served and was sufficient to indicate their intention to cross-examine witnesses. They argued that the prosecution’s interpretation was overly technical and urged the court to allow the matter to proceed in accordance with the rules of procedure.
Magistrate Jah did not immediately rule on the procedural dispute but adjourned the matter to enable both sides to file the necessary notices and documents. The adjournment also allows the defence time to prepare its witnesses after the prosecution indicated its intention to cross-examine them.
The accused persons are facing allegations of conspiracy to steal a shipping container, forging staff identification cards, and interfering with evidence during an ongoing police investigation.
The matter is expected to resume on 13 August 2026.
