Defense Challenges Prosecution's Case in VOPAD Radio Homicide Trial

In a pivotal courtroom development, defense attorney M. Baratay conducted a thorough cross-examination, challenging the prosecution's claims in the case involving the homicide at VOPAD Radio Station.

The proceedings centers on allegations of a conspiracy to murder journalist Samuel Brima Mattia, which the defense has strongly disputed. At Pademba Road Court No. 1, the accused individuals—journalist Joseph Mendel Lamin, known as “Manager Dust,” bike rider Morlai Kamara, and driver Umaru Timbo—made their fourth appearance before Magistrate Sahr Kekura.

The prosecution alleges that these individuals conspired with others on January 15, 2025, at the station in Kissi Town, Waterloo, to carry out the fatal attack. During the cross-examination, Mr. Baratay obtained testimony from witness Abubakarr Kargbo. Kargbo confirmed that the primary defendant denied any involvement in Mr. Mattia’s death, explicitly stating, “I have no involvement in the death of Mattia,” which Kargbo affirmed as a denial.

The defense then focused its questioning on the investigation conducted at VOPAD Radio. Kargbo testified that no altercation occurred at the station, and importantly, no body was found there on the day in question.

He further stated that the deceased's remains were discovered behind the Sierra Leone Correctional Center fence in Waterloo, a detail that introduces uncertainty into the prosecution's case. Additionally, Kargbo confirmed that the first accused was not present at the station during his visit, and that he did not conduct any forensic analysis on the electric cable associated with the case, but merely obtained statements from the suspect.

The testimony provided by the witness appeared to cast doubt on the prosecution's narrative and revealed potential oversights in the investigation. The proceedings, characterized by detailed inquiries and clarifications, have been adjourned until June 3, 2025, for further hearing.

The defense’s thorough cross-examination highlights the complexity and contentious nature of this high-profile legal matter, leaving the court to deliberate on the conflicting accounts presented.