Five Armed Robbers Jailed for Combined 166 Years Over Violent Market Attack

Five men convicted of carrying out a violent armed robbery have been sentenced to a combined total of 166 years imprisonment following a High Court ruling.

The convicts Mohamed Mansaray, Umaru Momoh Kanu, Momoh Kabba, Musa Kargbo, and Mohamed Kamara were found guilty of conspiracy to commit robbery with aggravation, armed robbery, and shooting with intent after a full trial before the High Court.

The court heard that on March 8, 2024, the five men conspired and executed a daring attack at a local marketplace while armed with guns and machetes. During the robbery, they targeted unsuspecting victims and stole mobile phones valued at Le2,500 and Le1,500, along with Le1,000 in cash, bringing the total value of stolen items to Le3,500.

In the course of the attack, one of the robbers reportedly opened fire on victim Yayah Barrie in what the prosecution described as an attempt to cause grievous bodily harm. The shooting formed a critical part of the charges relating to violence and intent.

All five accused pleaded not guilty when arraigned before Justice Fisher at the High Court. However, the prosecution presented what the court described as compelling and consistent evidence, including eyewitness testimonies that established their guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

Delivering his judgment, Justice Fisher underscored the gravity of the offences and the need for strong deterrent measures against violent crime. He sentenced Mohamed Mansaray to 30 years imprisonment, Umaru Momoh Kanu to 40 years, while Momoh Kabba, Musa Kargbo, and Mohamed Kamara were each sentenced to 28 years.

The sentences are to run concurrently, meaning each convict will serve a substantial custodial term as determined by the court.

Defence counsel from the Legal Aid Board, Randy Bangura, had pleaded for leniency, citing the youthfulness of the convicts and their potential for rehabilitation. However, the judge ruled that the seriousness of the crimes and the threat posed to public safety warranted firm punishment.

The ruling sends a strong signal that violent armed robbery will attract severe penalties, reinforcing the judiciary’s commitment to protecting citizens and maintaining public order.