Human Rights Commissioner Proposes Extending Presidential Term for Development

Human Rights Commissioner Proposes Extending Presidential Term for Development

Victor Idrissa Lansana Esq., Vice Chairman of the Human Rights Commission, has proposed that Sierra Leone consider extending the presidential term from five to seven years. He asserts that the current duration is insufficient for leaders to effectively implement meaningful and sustainable national development initiatives.

Lansana highlighted on Truth Media the profound, systemic setbacks stemming from the nation's history, including the legacies of slavery, colonial rule, and the protracted civil war. He argued that these challenges have created deep-rooted issues that cannot be adequately addressed within a standard five-year political cycle. "Five years is not enough," he stated, clarifying that his recommendation is strictly motivated by national development imperatives, not political considerations.

He further underscored the necessity of predictable governance, emphasizing that citizens must be able to anticipate and receive timely responses regarding essential public services. Lansana believes that establishing such clear standards will bolster public confidence in state institutions, thereby enhancing governmental transparency and accountability.

The Commissioner urged a national shift in focus from political discord and electoral debates toward long-term development strategies. He cautioned that the country has neglected to define the developmental path it seeks, noting that citizens sometimes inadvertently impede progress.

Concerning the judiciary, Lansana expressed concern over the protracted nature of court rulings, which he noted erodes public trust in the justice system. While acknowledging the efforts of the Attorney General, he stressed that further actions are required to ensure the timely dispensation of justice.

In addressing the Sierra Leone Bar Association, Lansana advised the executive to review and update its Memorandum and Articles of Association to ensure they remain fit for purpose, particularly concerning membership, elections, and critical governance structures. He also encouraged the Bar Association to take a more active role in holding the government accountable.

He commented on national divisions, pointing out that disagreements between professional entities, such as the Bar Association and the Lawyers Society, create broader implications, affecting the general populace and contributing to insular professional practices.

Regarding governance structure, Lansana proposed that the appointment of opposition members to public offices should be legally guaranteed, rather than solely dependent on presidential discretion, to ensure political inclusivity. He stressed that robust legal frameworks are vital for safeguarding fairness and transparency in political representation.

Commenting on governmental priorities, he stated, "Tripartite is not a priority; it does not put food on the table," underscoring the need for the government and citizens to concentrate on pragmatic development issues that directly improve livelihoods.

Lansana concluded by advocating for a legislated national development plan. He suggested this plan be collectively drafted by representatives from all sectors of society and formally submitted to Parliament. He argued that such a measure would ensure continuity and stability in the country’s growth, regardless of changes in political administration.