top of page

Basita Michael Critiques Selective Moral Outrage in International Discourse

Basita Michael Critiques Selective Moral Outrage in International Discourse
Basita Michael Critiques Selective Moral Outrage in International Discourse

Sierra Leonean lawyer Basita Michael has challenged what she terms “selective moral outrage” within the international discourse surrounding Female Genital Mutilation (FGM).


While reaffirming her unequivocal opposition to FGM—which she defines as a practice with severe physical and psychological consequences that cannot be justified by culture or politics—Michael argues that current debates regarding the cancellation of speaking engagements require a broader context.


Michael contends that global institutions frequently platform individuals and leaders associated with severe human rights violations without facing equivalent public scrutiny. She questions the consistency of international moral standards, highlighting a discrepancy where some figures are condemned while others accused of grave abuses are afforded prestigious platforms.


According to Michael, the central issue is not the scrutiny of public figures, but rather the inconsistent application of accountability. She notes broader contradictions in diplomacy, citing instances where public officials from nations like Sierra Leone promote democracy and governance abroad while failing to uphold these same standards domestically.


Michael also referenced the persistent international platforming of individuals associated with Sierra Leone’s drug crisis, despite the significant threat posed to public safety. She argues that the recent controversy involving the First Lady should be evaluated against this backdrop, asserting that many powerful figures have faced few, if any, consequences for similar actions.


Ultimately, Michael maintains that while criticism of FGM advocacy is legitimate, such discourse must be applied with consistency and fairness to remain credible. Her comments contribute to ongoing global debates regarding freedom of expression, human rights advocacy, and the standards employed by international institutions in selecting speakers.



Comments


bottom of page